Pascual v. Dozier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, “it is error to strike a relevant witness where the opposing party is aware of the proposed testimony”
• \The exclusion of the testimony of expert witnesses must be carefully considered and sparingly done.\
• \[T]he exclusion of the testimony of expert witnesses must be carefully considered and sparingly done.\
• error to strike party’s only witness so as to be left unable to present evidence to support theory of case
• “[I]t is error to strike a relevant witness where the opposing party is aware of the proposed testimony.”
• “The exclusion of the testimony of expert witnesses must be carefully considered and sparingly done.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).