Pascua v. American Airlines Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that “numerous courts in this Circuit” have held the same
• rejecting plaintiffs argument that conditional certification requires merely showing that plaintiff and the putative ' class were subject to the unlawful application of a facially lawful policy
• denying conditional certification because plaintiff failed to provide any “affidavits, depositions, or even hearsay evidence [to show] that he was actually aware of other [employees with the same job title] who also primarily performed non-exempt duties”
• denying conditional certification when “Plaintiff has not provided the Court with anything other than conclusory allegations and his own deposition testimony to support his assertion” that his employer’s policies violated the FLSA
• denying collective motion where named plaintiff provided only his “own deposition testimony, discussing his own personal experience[,]” without “other affidavits, depositions, or even hearsay evidence that he was actually aware of other” similarly situated employees
• denying conditional certification of nationwide collective where, other than his deposition, “[p]laintiff provide[d] no other affidavits, depositions, or even hearsay evidence that he was actually aware of other [managers] who also primarily performed non-exempt duties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).