Paschall v. Ohio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, before Harlow, it was relevant “if [a defendant] did not actually know his conduct was unconstitutional” and that “Harlow eliminated any consideration of the defendant’s intent as it relates to his knowledge of the law”
• affirming denial of qualified immunity on summary judgment because plaintiff had specific evidence from which one could infer defendants recklessly made false statements in and omitted material information from warrant affidavits
• one could infer from four-month delay in acting on victim statement that detective did not believe information sufficient to link suspect to crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).