Paschal v. the State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was highly probable that inadmissible evidence did not contribute to the jury's verdict in light of other overwhelming evidence of guilt
• rejecting claim that counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object to limiting instruction when counsel testified that not doing so was a matter of trial strategy
• “In light of this overwhelming evidence, it is highly probable that the evidence of [the defendant’s] 1989 convictions did not contribute to the jury’s verdict.”
• in light of overwhelming evidence, defendant could not show prejudice prong of ineffective assistance claim
• in light of overwhelming evidence, defendant could not show prejudice prong of ineffective assistance claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).