Pascarella v. Swift Transportation Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Rule 9(b)’s particularity requirement for averments of fraud [wa]s inapplicable to [p]laintiff’s NJCFA claim” for unconscionable commercial practice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).