Pascalides v. ZONING BD. OF CRANSTON

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• precluding applicant from claiming his parcel was two separate lots after having previously treated the parcel as one lot to obtain zoning relief
• \The character of a neighborhood . . . is determined largely by the nature of the uses permitted in the district\
• typographical error held to be harmless error where identification of the particular parcel was still clear and definite
• Applicant could not claim his lot was two separate lots after having treated the land as one lot to previously obtain relief before the Zoning Board
• \The applicant was entitled to have its land treated as one lot for its purpose in seeking to obtain relief from the zoning board. . . .\
• incorrect description of 1180 Narragansett Boulevard, lots 1912 and 3998, where the correct description was actually 1180 Narragansett Boulevard, lots 1912 and 3898, sufficient notice to confer jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).