Skip to main content
· 3/19/2015

Parviz Jahangirizadeh v. Fatemeh Pazouki

Citations

  • 27 N.E.3d 1178
  • 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 165
  • 2015 WL 1260061

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to review allegations of fraud under this statutory provision where husband “relied solely upon Trial Rule 60(B)”
  • determining the concealment of $50,000 bank deposit from a financial declaration was a form of ordinary fraud
  • determining the concealment of $50,000 bank deposit from a financial declaration was a form of ordinary fraud
  • “To the extent Pazouki may have been less-than-forthright regarding her assets—assuming Jahangirizadeh's allegations to be true—this is the type of ‘ordinary’ fraud that must be subject to the one-year time limit of Trial Rule 60(B)(3).”
  • equating dismissal of Trial Rule 60(B) motion with denial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Pyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.