Parvin Katir v. Columbia University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an individual “lack[ed] standing to challenge [an arbitration award]” because “[she] was not a party to the arbitration”
• noting that in Brillhart, “[t]he Supreme Court has provided guidance for 24 the exercise of the district court’s discretionary decision whether to entertain declaratory relief”
• individual who is not a party to an arbitration proceeding is without standing to challenge the proceeding
• “[A]n individual employee represented by a union generally does not have standing to challenge an arbitration proceeding to which the union and the employer were the only parties.”
• “[A]n individual employee represented by a union generally does not have standing to challenge an arbitration proceeding to which the union and the employer were the only parties.”
• “[A]n individual employee represented by a union generally does not have standing to challenge an arbitration proceeding to which the union and the employer were the only parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).