Partap v. Holder Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a child who was not born when the Immigration Judge considered a cancellation application was not a “child” within the meaning of the statute
• “[B]ecause [claimant] did not tender any evidence showing ‘exceptional and extremely unusual hardship,’ the BIA did not abuse its discretion in declining to enter a remand order.”
• no abuse of discretion in denying motion to remand to apply for cancellation after the birth of a U.S. citizen child where petitioner did not tender any evidence showing “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship”
• analogizing motions to reopen with motions to remand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).