Partain v. Upstate Automotive Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Partain could not have contemplated that, in signing the arbitration clause, he was agreeing to arbitrate claims arising from allegedly fraudulent conduct
• finding that a claim involving a \bait and switch\ in relation to a used car purchase was outrageous and unforeseeable and thus was not subject to arbitration
• \The determination whether a claim is subject to arbitration is subject to de novo review.\
• Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 6 at 28

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).