Parsowith v. Com., Dept. of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding an issue in the interest of judicial economy that could have been decided on remand
• taking a similar approach in addressing, for the sake of judicial economy, a merits issue that had not been addressed in the intermediate appellate court
• taking a similar approach in addressing, for the sake of judicial economy, a merits issue that had not been addressed in the intermediate appellate court
• taking a similar approach in addressing, for the sake of judicial economy, a merits issue that had not been addressed in the intermediate appellate court
• characterizing the inquiry as a “flexible, case-specific approach which permits a narrow category of claims to bypass the ordinary route of appeal, where pursuit of statutory remedies would be pointless, or such remedies would be inadequate”
• F&R is not a competent tribunal to pass upon a challenge of a statute’s validity or constitutionality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).