Skip to main content
· 1/12/1922

Parsons v. Hamrick

Citations

  • 118 Wash. 305
  • 203 P. 371
  • 1922 Wash. LEXIS 634

Syllabus

<p>Highways (52, 57) — Automobiles—Negligent Use — Evidence— Sufficiency. In an action for injuries to plaintiff’s automobile as the result of a rear-end collision on a public highway, the findings of the trial court are sustained by proof that plaintiff’s car was bumped into while all its lights were burning, and while traveling on a straight road, in view of the circumstance that defendant, if traveling at the moderate rate of speed testified to, could have seen plaintiff’s car in time to have stopped.</p>

Judges: Fullerton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.