Parsons v. Hamrick
Citations
- 118 Wash. 305
- 203 P. 371
- 1922 Wash. LEXIS 634
Syllabus
<p>Highways (52, 57) — Automobiles—Negligent Use — Evidence— Sufficiency. In an action for injuries to plaintiff’s automobile as the result of a rear-end collision on a public highway, the findings of the trial court are sustained by proof that plaintiff’s car was bumped into while all its lights were burning, and while traveling on a straight road, in view of the circumstance that defendant, if traveling at the moderate rate of speed testified to, could have seen plaintiff’s car in time to have stopped.</p>
Judges: Fullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.