Parsons v. Ball

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that individual plaintiffs who alleged separate incidents of unlawful traffic stops did not have standing to pursue injunctive relief
• finding that allegations of six incidents of unlawful seizures at traffic checkpoints were insufficient to show a municipal custom
• finding that allegations of six incidents of unlawful seizures at traffic checkpoints were insufficient to show a municipal custom
• finding that allegations of six incidents of unlawful seizures at traffic checkpoints were insufficient to show a municipal custom
• noting that “courts in this Circuit . . . have refused to treat [criminal complaints] as integral to a complaint that alleges false arrest or malicious prosecution claims,” and collecting cases
• concluding plaintiffs lacked standing to seek injunctive relief from allegedly unconstitutional police checkpoints along a highway because plaintiffs failed to plausibly allege that the practice was “widespread” or that they had been unlawfully stopped repeatedly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).