· 6/30/1992
Parson v. Cole (In Re Cole)
Citations
- 142 B.R. 140
- 6 Tex.Bankr.Ct.Rep. 281
- 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 1016
- 1992 WL 155795
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “However, the court decided that in [In re] Bade [87 B.R. 78 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1988) ] a dismissal would in fact be prejudicial since the time in which to file an action to establish the non-dischargeability of a debt had expired.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John C. Akard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.