Skip to main content
· 6/30/1992

Parson v. Cole (In Re Cole)

Citations

  • 142 B.R. 140
  • 6 Tex.Bankr.Ct.Rep. 281
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 1016
  • 1992 WL 155795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “However, the court decided that in [In re] Bade [87 B.R. 78 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1988) ] a dismissal would in fact be prejudicial since the time in which to file an action to establish the non-dischargeability of a debt had expired.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John C. Akard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.