Skip to main content
· 11/8/1996

Parsippany Hotel Management Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Citations

  • 99 F.3d 413
  • 321 U.S. App. D.C. 274
  • 153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2781
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29086

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding animus when a high-level manager made anti-union comments that were never repudiated despite not being involved in the disciplining of the employee
  • finding substantial evidence where documentary evidence corroborated employee’s testimony and employer witness discredited herself through contradictory statements
  • “Th[e] prohibition against surveillance does not prevent employers from observing public union activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Silberman, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.