· 11/8/1996
Parsippany Hotel Management Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Citations
- 99 F.3d 413
- 321 U.S. App. D.C. 274
- 153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2781
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29086
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding animus when a high-level manager made anti-union comments that were never repudiated despite not being involved in the disciplining of the employee
- finding substantial evidence where documentary evidence corroborated employee’s testimony and employer witness discredited herself through contradictory statements
- “Th[e] prohibition against surveillance does not prevent employers from observing public union activity.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wald, Silberman, Sentelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.