Parseghian v. Frequency Therapeutics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “‘sexually graphic, violently misogynistic’ music [is] one form of 28 harassment that can pollute a workplace and give rise to a Title VII claim”
• stating that “gender-specific epithets,” . . ha[ve] been consistently held to constitute harassment based upon sex”
• stating that “gender-specific epithets,” . . ha[ve] been consistently held to constitute harassment based upon sex”
• collecting and discussing cases in which the employer exposed all employees to music or other auditory programming with offensive gender-specific or sex- ual references
• collecting and discussing cases in which the employer exposed all employees to music or other auditory programming with offensive gender-specific or sex- ual references
• finding sexually graphic and violently misogynistic music was sufficiently severe or pervasive to sustain a hostile work environment claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).