Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \a party cannot challenge a verdict for punitive damages as excessive until after the jury renders its verdict\ (emphasis in original)
• federal constitution requires the availability of post-verdict judicial adjustment of grossly excessive punitive damages awards
• “[W]hen reviewing a punitive damages award for excessiveness, the reviewing court must view the facts in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict if there is evidence in the record to support them.”
• “[W]e hold that, when reviewing a punitive damages award for excessiveness, the reviewing court must view the facts in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict if there is evidence in the record to support them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).