Skip to main content

Parrish v. Marquis

Citations

  • 137 S.W.3d 621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the one-year statute of limitations provided by the savings statute commences on the date the trial court enters dismissal on -4- remand, and not on date of the appellate court’s judgment remanding the matter
  • “Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeals’ judgment and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of issues pretermitted by its ruling.”
  • “When an appellate court remands an action to a trial court, the trial court regains jurisdiction over the matter.” (citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 21-1-810)
  • “We hold that the statute of limitations commenced on the date of the -9- trial court’s order of dismissal [without prejudice for improper venue] and that the plaintiffs’ re-filing of their action was therefore timely under the savings statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Janice M. Holder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.