· 8/11/1999
Parrish v. HBO & Co.
Citations
- 85 F. Supp. 2d 792
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21053
- 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 372
- 1999 WL 1485312
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding section 1367(d) inapplicable to plaintiff's state law claims that plaintiff voluntarily dismissed
- “It is well established that a state saving statute cannot ‘save’ a federal claim that is governed by its own statute of limitations.”
- “The Court finds no evidence that § 1367 was intended to act as a savings statute, allowing a plaintiff to refile in federal court. Thus, the Court concludes that § 1367(d
- discussing application of 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.