Skip to main content
· 8/11/1999

Parrish v. HBO & Co.

Citations

  • 85 F. Supp. 2d 792
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21053
  • 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 372
  • 1999 WL 1485312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding section 1367(d) inapplicable to plaintiff's state law claims that plaintiff voluntarily dismissed
  • “It is well established that a state saving statute cannot ‘save’ a federal claim that is governed by its own statute of limitations.”
  • “The Court finds no evidence that § 1367 was intended to act as a savings statute, allowing a plaintiff to refile in federal court. Thus, the Court concludes that § 1367(d
  • discussing application of 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.