Skip to main content
· 11/2/2009

Parris v. State Employees' Retirement Board

Citations

  • 983 A.2d 821
  • 2009 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1553
  • 2009 WL 3522241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We ... hold that the UF and CPWL statutes are not facially invalid.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pellegrini, Simpson, Kelley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.