Parramore v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]o violate OCGA § 16-11-131 (b), [the defendant] needed only to possess—not own—the gun in question.”
• “[The defendant] does not dispute his prior felony conviction, and the following evidence was sufficient to establish that [he] had constructive possession of the weapon: (1
• standard applied in review of jury verdict
• “Possession can be either actual or constructive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).