Parra v. Continental Tire North America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering new arguments in motion for new trial because plaintiffs appealed from denial of new trial motion
• reviewing the record to determine whether substantial evidence supported the court's dismissal under forum non conveniens where superior court had recited the relevant factors and held oral argument on the motion to dismiss
• reviewing the record to determine whether substantial evidence supported the court's dismissal under forum non conveniens where the superior court had recited the relevant factors and held oral argument on the motion to dismiss
• finding an abuse of discretion when the court \fails to balance the relevant factors\ and the facts and argument were not \sufficient to overcome the deference properly accorded to the plaintiffs' decision to file suit in Arizona\
• “Where factors of convenience are closely balanced, the plaintiff is entitled to its choice of forum.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).