· 10/26/1992
Parr v. Gaines
Citations
- 424 S.E.2d 515
- 309 S.C. 477
- 1992 S.C. App. LEXIS 167
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the above exact language in Rule 43(c)(1), SCRCP, merely states that once a contemporaneous objection is made, no further reservation of rights is needed to preserve the objection, but it does not alter the rule requiring a contemporaneous objection
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Cureton, Goolsby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.