Skip to main content
· 4/4/1978

Parojinog v. State

Citations

  • 384 A.2d 86
  • 282 Md. 256
  • 5 A.L.R. 4th 225
  • 1978 Md. LEXIS 365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that although a hearing may have been styled as a “waiver hearing,” when adjudication and disposition occurred at that hearing, the nature of the hearing was no longer that of a waiver hearing, and therefore would not be treated as such on appeal
  • although juvenile judge lacked authority under the statute and rules to enter a verdict when he did, the verdict is final for jeopardy purposes because the court had subject matter jurisdiction and jurisdiction over the respondent
  • although juvenile judge lacked authority under the statute and rules to enter a verdict when he did, the verdict is final for jeopardy purposes because the court had subject matter jurisdiction and jurisdiction over the respondent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.