Skip to main content
· 8/31/1895

Parmley v. Healy

Citations

  • 7 S.D. 401
  • 64 N.W. 186
  • 1895 S.D. LEXIS 84

Syllabus

<p>1. As the effect of writing a name which appears in print upon a. ballot, immediately beneath the erased name of an opposing candidate upon another ticket, is to make the name thus written appear more than once, the ballot must be counted as a vote for neither candidate. Laws 2893, Sec. 1, Chap. 80.</p> <p>2. All other questions presented are fully discussed and decided in Vallier v. Brakke (S. D.) 64 N. W. 180, by which this case is ruled.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.</p>

Judges: Fuller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.