Parmer v. Ballard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding federal district courts have exclusive jurisdiction over ECOA claims
• \The United States Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction over the breach of settlement agreements with the United States.\
• “The United States Court of Federal Claims ... is not a United States District Court and, therefore, does not have jurisdiction over claims arising under 28 U.S.C. § 1331”
• “The United States Court of Federal Claims ... is not a United States District Court and, therefore, does not have jurisdic-, tion over claims arising under 28 U.S.C. § 1331”
• Tucker Act jurisdiction existed over claim that USDA breached settlement agreement with African-American farmer
• “The United States Court of Federal Claims . . . is not a United States District Court and, therefore, does not have jurisdiction over claims arising under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).