Skip to main content
· 2/20/1996

Parma Tile Mosaic & Marble Co. v. Short

Citations

  • 663 N.E.2d 633
  • 87 N.Y.2d 524
  • 640 N.Y.S.2d 477
  • 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “a signature for Statute of Frauds purposes may be ‘a name, written or printed . . .’” so long as it was included with an apparent intent to authenticate the writing
  • programmed imprint of sender’s name insufficient to authenticate every document faxed; an intent to authenticate the specific writing at issue must be demonstrated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.