· 8/4/2004
Parkway Corp. v. Edelstein
Citations
- 861 A.2d 264
- 2004 Pa. Super. 307
- 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2342
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that ignorance was not a reasonable justification for failure to comply with Rule 1042.3
- concluding that ignorance was not a reasonable justification for failure to comply with Rule 1042.3
- holding that a party’s ignorance of a procedural rule was not an excuse for the party’s failure to comply with that rule
- stating appellants did not provide “reasonable explanation or legitimate excuse” when they “offer[ed] only ignorance as justification”
- “There is especially no necessity for notice to be given of intent to file a praecipe for non pros, as the note to Rule 1042.6 specifically states that Rule 237.1 ‘does not apply to a judgment of non pros entered under this rule.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hudock, Melvin, Montemuro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.