Skip to main content
· 8/4/2004

Parkway Corp. v. Edelstein

Citations

  • 861 A.2d 264
  • 2004 Pa. Super. 307
  • 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that ignorance was not a reasonable justification for failure to comply with Rule 1042.3
  • concluding that ignorance was not a reasonable justification for failure to comply with Rule 1042.3
  • holding that a party’s ignorance of a procedural rule was not an excuse for the party’s failure to comply with that rule
  • stating appellants did not provide “reasonable explanation or legitimate excuse” when they “offer[ed] only ignorance as justification”
  • “There is especially no necessity for notice to be given of intent to file a praecipe for non pros, as the note to Rule 1042.6 specifically states that Rule 237.1 ‘does not apply to a judgment of non pros entered under this rule.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudock, Melvin, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.