Skip to main content
· 10/24/2008

Parkview Court Associates v. Delaware County Board of Assessment Appeals

Citations

  • 959 A.2d 515
  • 2008 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 524
  • 2008 WL 4682229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an argument challenging an expert’s methodology “essentially seeks a new credibility finding … which is inappropriate on appeal.”
  • concluding that an argument challenging an expert’s methodology “essentially seeks a new credibility finding . . . which is inappropriate on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith-Ribner, Simpson, Kelley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.