Parks v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Defendant’s motion did not present any valid exceptions to the time limitations under the rule.... Further, Defendant’s motion was successive as the claims could have been raised in one of his previous motions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tukes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-13· cited 3×
• Schultheis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-22· cited 3×
• Sears v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-27· cited 2×
• Golfe v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-04-24· cited 2×
• Grant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-04-24
• Gregg v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-20
• Santy Castillo v. The State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-06-12

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Baker v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-03-11· cited 1,190×
• State v. Spencer
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-09-23· cited 837×
• Logan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-11· cited 29×