Parks v. Board of Trustees of the California State University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting defendant’s summary judgment 24 motion on plaintiff professor’s claims for, inter alia, age discrimination under FEHA where 25 disciplinary action was based on complaints by students
• noting 13 that internal investigations, suspensions, letters of reprimand, and job assignments are all 14 “conduct that fits squarely under the category of ‘personnel management actions’” and thus “do 15 not constitute harassment under FEHA”
• “There is no admissible evidence that 1 shows that the social environment of the workplace had become intolerable because of racial 2 conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).