Skip to main content
· 9/18/2015

Parks, Christopher Wesley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing defendant's right to be present at a bench conference where the topic of striking a potential juror was discussed
  • recognizing a defendant’s right to be present at a bench conference where the topic of striking a potential juror is discussed
  • noting that child’s prior statements to forensic interviewer and investigator could be considered as substantive evidence
  • if defendant fails to meet his burden on one prong of the two-prong Strickland test, this court need not review the other prong
  • defense counsel stated on the record that he explained the right to be present and that his client agreed to discussing the content of the bench conferences at counsel’s table

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.