· 1/5/1978
Parkridge v. City of Seattle
Citations
- 573 P.2d 359
- 89 Wash. 2d 454
- 1978 Wash. LEXIS 1332
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- developer had vested right, despite incomplete application, because of diligent efforts to complete application, which were frustrated by the city
- developer had vested right, despite incomplete application, because of diligent efforts to complete application, which were frustrated by the city
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hicks
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.