Parking Concepts, Inc. v. Tenney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “damages [are] an essential element of [a] 25 breach-of-contract claim”
• involving excess insurer that settled claims against its insured after primary insurer failed to defend or indemnify
• identifying “damages as an essential element of [a] 22 breach-of-contract claim”
• “[N]either party to the standard Morris agreement has any compelling reason to act reasonably in setting the settlement amount.”
• “Morns neither imposes new contractual duties on the insurer nor otherwise expands the rights of the insured under the contract of insurance”
• “[I]n cases where the insurer has refused to defend and the parties enter into a 2 Damron agreement, the insurer has no right to contest the stipulated damages on the basis 3 of reasonableness, but rather may contest the settlement only for fraud or collusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).