Skip to main content
Federal Circuit· 12/15/2023

Parkervision, Inc. v. Vidal

Citations

  • 88 F.4th 969

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the Board did not abuse its direction in excluding ParkerVision’s sur-reply arguments “because they proceeded in a ‘new direction’ relative to ParkerVi- sion’s patent owner’s response”
  • “The patentee’s use of the phrases ‘as used herein’ and ‘refer to’ conveys an intent . . . to be definitional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.