Parker v. U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Fourteenth Amendment protects the 7 right of spouses to “the support and companionship of each other”
• denying summary judgment to agency where agency had not made it clear whether responsive records were transferred to NARA
• denying summary judgment to agency where “there had been no clear factual showing” that the ex-employee’s “records were actually moved or received”
• stating principles underlying right to familial association 6 for parents and children “establish a constitutional basis for the right of spouses to the 7 support and companionship of each other.”
• finding no actual agency, in part, where “there is no indication 18 that Defendant had the right to hire or supervise YWAM–Bishop’s staff, or to control the activities 19 of YWAM–Bishop.”
• “[T]he court finds that there is no evidence from which a reasonable jury 19 could find that Plaintiff relied on the representations by University in deciding to enroll in the 20 SOAR course.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).