Parker v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• examining whether the 5 petitioner’s federal habeas claims were impliedly exhausted under the Arizona Supreme 6 Court’s statutory automatic review
• slumped in a wheelchair, bleeding, nearly naked, shackled and with his hands bound
• \`[T]he waiver concept was never intended as a means of allowing a criminal defendant to choose his own sentence.'\ (alteration in original) (quoting Com. v. McKenna , 383 A.2d 174, 181 (Pa. 1978))
• “ ‘[T]he waiver concept was never intended as a means of allowing a criminal defendant to choose his own sentence.’ ” (alteration in original) (quoting Com. v. McKenna, 383 A.2d 174, 181 (Pa. 1978))
• con- cluding the district court did not clearly err in determining the petitioner did not have PTSD in light of an expert’s inability to apply the DSM-IV criteria accurately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).