Skip to main content

Parker v. State

Citations

  • 985 S.W.2d 460
  • 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 9
  • 1999 WL 59658

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that there is great deal of overlap between terms pass, utter, and publish as used in forgery statute
  • noting that there is great deal of overlap between terms pass, utter, and publish as used in forgery statute
  • giving words their plain meaning when a statute does not define the words used
  • “[A]n instrument is passed within the meaning of the forgery statute if it is delivered or circulated.”
  • both sufficiency and notice claims raised, each analyzed separately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCORMICK

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.