Parker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is clear to us that [the Court has] no power to conduct hearings of any kind to determine the fact as to whether or not this transcript is a correct recording of what took place at the trial….”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tricoche v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1987-05-05· cited 109×
• State v. Trott
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1972-03-31· cited 16×
• Waller v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1978-11-06· cited 9×
• IMO Montgomery
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2020-03-04
• State v. Montgomery
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2021-05-05
• Parker v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1966-06-21
• T&H Bail Bonds, Inc. v. Preferred Investment Services, Inc.
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2022-01-04
• Schiavo, Charles v. TD Bank USA National Association and Clover Network, LLC
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2026-06-22

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barber Asphalt Paying Co. v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co.
  Supreme Court· 1928-01-03· cited 32×
• Freitas v. Peerless Stages, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1952-01-18· cited 26×
• Powers v. Rosenbloom
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1948-06-15· cited 7×
• Morgan v. Curtenius
  Supreme Court· 1857-01-15· cited 2×