Parker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that enhancement under section 775.087(1) is impermissible unless the defendant actually possesses a weapon during the commission of a crime
• noting that reclassification under section 775.087(1) is impermissible unless the defendant actually possesses a weapon during the commission of the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Connolly, Jr. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-29· cited 23×
• Cochran v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-03· cited 10×
• Postell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-04· cited 6×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Rodriguez
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-07-02· cited 56×
• Demps v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-10· cited 6×
• Thompson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-01-21· cited 6×
• Blanc v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-06· cited 4×
• Clark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-03· cited 4×
• Smith v. Locklear
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-29· cited 2×