Parker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “we need not address the status of the 'day before' rule because in this case [the defendant] committed the criminal act on his, natal day, not the day preceding it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Duarte-Ceri v. Holder
  Second Circuit· 2010-12-06· cited 32×
• Mason v. Board of Education
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-16· cited 15×
• State v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1997-11-21· cited 13×
• Velazquez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-01-06· cited 13×
• In Re Darren M.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-02-15· cited 13×
• Ellingham v. Morton
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-01-24· cited 9×
• Duarte v. Holder
  Second Circuit· 2010-12-06· cited 1×