Parker v. Shecut

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing, in a partition action, that whether Respondents were entitled to appellate attorney’s fees pursuant to section 15-61-110 was a determination for the circuit court
• explaining that ouster damages are rental value minus allowable expenses
• indicating a claim for ouster is an equitable claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Whippie v. O'Connor
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-08-15· cited 13×
• Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-10-23· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anderson v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-07-31· cited 46×
• Calhoun v. Calhoun
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-06· cited 40×
• Christy v. Christy
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-11-04· cited 21×
• Muller v. Myrtle Beach Golf & Yacht Club
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-12-06· cited 19×
• Parker v. Shecut
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-04-15· cited 11×
• Woods v. Bivens
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-04-13· cited 10×
• Taylor ex rel. Taylor v. Medenica
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-08-20· cited 3×