Parker v. Richard
Citations
- 250 U.S. 235
- 39 S. Ct. 442
- 63 L. Ed. 954
- 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1739
Syllabus
<p>Under § 9 of the Act of May 27,1908, c. 199, 35 Stat. 312, providing “that the death of any allottee . . . shall operate to remove all restrictions upon the alienation of said allottee’s land: Provided, That ho conveyance of any interest of any full-blood Indian heir in such land shall be valid unless approved by the court having jurisdiction of the settlement of the estate of said deceased allottee,” lands of a deceased full-blood allottee, descended to a full-blood heir and • not conveyed with the approval of such court, are “restricted lands” in the sense of § 2 of the same act, which provides that leases of “restricted lands” for oil, gas or other mining purposes may be made, with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, under rules and regulations provided by him, and not otherwise. P. 238.</p> <p>The fact that by the proviso of § 9, supra, Congress authorized a state court-practically as a federal agency-to sanction conveyances, does not affect the force and operation of the restrictions while they remain. Id.</p> <p>During the continuance of such restrictions, the duty to protect the interests of the full-blood heir by supervising the collection, care and disbursement of royalties arising from an oil and gas lease made under § 2, remains with the Secretary of the Interior. P. 239.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding a provision in a federal statute which conditioned the conveyance of certain Indian lands upon the approval of a state court
- upholding provision that conditioned the conveyance of certain Indian lands upon the approval of a state court
- upholding provision that conditioned the conveyance of certain Indian lands upon the approval of a state court
- upholding a provision in a federal statute which conditioned the conveyance of certain Indian lands upon the approval of a state court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Devanter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Prudential Insurance v. BenjaminSupreme Court· 1946-06-03· cited 408×
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-06-14· cited 113×
- Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-06-14· cited 67×
- United States v. HellardSupreme Court· 1944-05-22· cited 52×
- United States v. BrownEighth Circuit· 1925-10-29· cited 43×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1971-12-12· cited 41×
- United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co.Ninth Circuit· 1971-12-06· cited 37×
- Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior v. Norman M. LittellD.C. Circuit· 1966-10-14· cited 36×
- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ETC. v. SeberTenth Circuit· 1942-08-22· cited 34×
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. OwensTenth Circuit· 1935-07-03· cited 27×
- Burgess v. NailTenth Circuit· 1939-03-23· cited 25×
- Glenn v. LewisTenth Circuit· 1939-06-22· cited 19×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1997-06-13· cited 18×
- Nellie Atkins Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd., a Limited PartnershipTenth Circuit· 1975-02-21· cited 15×
- Grisso v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1943-11-10· cited 15×
- United States v. RansomEighth Circuit· 1922-09-11· cited 15×
- Lac Courte Oreilles Band Of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians Of Wisconsin v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2004-04-29· cited 14×
- United States v. Gypsy Oil Co.Eighth Circuit· 1925-12-18· cited 14×
- Whitebird v. Eagle-Picher Lead Co.Tenth Circuit· 1930-04-04· cited 13×
- Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1997-03-31· cited 13×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Other cases named Parker v. Richard
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.