Parker v. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that attorney violated Rule 4.2 when he deposed opposing party in a separate case without the presence of counsel
• stating that counsel cannot close his eyes to the obvious that a party is represented
• barring defendants from using testimony from deposition taken outside of counsel’s presence and ordering destruction of all materials related to the deposition
• allowing defendant to depose plaintiff in the future, subject to certain restrictions, after taking plaintiffs deposition without counsel present

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).