Parker v. Ohio Dept Job & Family Serv.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Med-Data was not entitled to discover the computer source code used in Revello’s program where Med-Data had neither identified with reasonable particularity the nature of its claimed trade secret nor established that it exists”
• “[Med-Data] concedes that before proceeding with discovery in [a trade-secret misappropriation] suit, the plaintiff must identify with reasonable particularity the nature of the trade secret involved.”
• “If the circuit judge does not have the requisite experience in examining [computer source] code, he may wish to appoint a neutral computer expert to review [the party’s] program.”
• “[Med–Data] concedes that before proceeding with discovery in [a tradesecret misappropriation] suit, the plaintiff must identify with reasonable particularity the nature of the trade secret involved.”
• “[Med–Data] concedes that before proceeding with discovery in [a trade-secret misappropriation] suit, the plaintiff must identify with reasonable particularity the nature of the trade secret involved.”
• “If the circuit judge does not have the requisite experience in examining [computer source] code, he may wish to appoint a neutral computer expert to review [the party’s] program.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).