Parker v. Mullen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• testimony that testator’s attorney had advised him that use of the word “children” rather than “issue” would allow an adopted child, for whom the testator had expressed a desire to provide, to benefit from a designation of “children” as remaindermen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).