Parker v. Mid-Century Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellant did not challenge one of the district court's conclusions of law; therefore, the ruling was deemed conclusive
• appellant did not challenge one of the district court's conclusions of law, and the ruling was deemed conclusive
• first citing Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-208(c); then citing Lee v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 497 S.E.2d 328, 329 (Va. 1998)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).