Skip to main content
· 11/6/2000

Parker v. Grand Hyatt Hotel

Citations

  • 124 F. Supp. 2d 79
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17024
  • 2000 WL 1724556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding “that the standards of police and security training relate to an occupation that is ‘beyond the ken of the average layman’”
  • rejecting argument that defendant was exempt from CPPA liability because he was not a “merchant” because defendant recommended the supplier of a service and oversaw and monitored his work
  • interpreting § 12-309 to provide that “[b]efore filing a lawsuit against the District of Columbia for unliquidated damages, a claimant must file notice with the mayor within six months of the alleged injury”
  • calling the police for assistance does not establish joint action for the police
  • negligent hiring, training, and supervision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.