Skip to main content
· 11/2/2004

Parker v. GINSBURG DEVELOPMENT CT, LLC

Citations

  • 859 A.2d 46
  • 85 Conn. App. 777
  • 2004 Conn. App. LEXIS 466

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that amended complaint was not materially different, binding plaintiff to court’s judgment striking amended complaint
  • plaintiff bound to court’s judgment striking amended complaint because amended complaint was not materially different
  • plaintiff bound to court’s judgment striking amended complaint because amended complaint was not materially different
  • when allegations of amended complaint appear to be same in substance as those of earlier complaint that was stricken, defendant may challenge amended complaint by filing request to revise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flynn, West, Mihalakos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.