Parker v. FUTURES UNLIMITED, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• conflicting evidence authorized trier of fact to find that “money advanced to appellant by the appellee was a loan to be repaid and not compensation for employment”
• conflicting evidence authorized trier of fact to find that “money advanced to appellant by the appellee was a loan to be repaid and not compensation for employment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).